It’s Official: Interaction to Next Paint (INP) to Become a Core Web Vitals Metric
The INP Measurement Will Replace First Input Delay (FID) in March 2024
Google’s announcement that INP will become an official part of Core Web Vitals isn’t too much of a surprise. During Google’s I/O conference in May 2022, it was announced that the INP metric was still in its experimental phase. You can watch the announcement here:
The state of responsiveness on the web.youtu.be
The Google Chrome team then designated INP as a pending metric in 2023, and announced that it would advance to stable status in March 2024.
INP’s promotional timeline. From Google.
Click here to catch up on the definitions of Google’s Core Web Vitals and why they can be a deal-breaker when it comes to your website’s success.
Now that INP is set to become a Core Web Vitals metric, failing to optimize for this measurement could negatively impact your website's overall performance and search engine rankings. The good news is that there’s still time to make sure that your site is ready for this major shift. Let’s break down what INP is and how you can make sure that your site is optimized for it.
What Is INP?
An example of what good and poor responsiveness looks like for users. From Google.
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) takes an overall measurement of how quickly a website responds to interactions by a user. Think of an interaction as anything that a user can do on a website, whether it’s tapping an element on a touch screen or pressing a key on a keyboard.
According to Google, a site’s INP score represents a page's overall interaction latency by selecting one of the single longest interactions that occur when a user visits a page. For pages with less than 50 interactions in total, INP is the interaction with the worst latency. For pages with many interactions, INP is most often the 98th percentile of interaction latency.
Here’s a look at how Google determines what’s a good or bad INP score:
How INP is measured. From Google.
Click here to read more about INP and how exactly Google measures your site’s interactions.
Why INP Is More Challenging Than FID
Google’s First Input Delay (FID) metric quantifies a user's experience when trying to interact with unresponsive pages, but it only measures the first interaction. According to Google, INP takes a more well-rounded measurement of a site’s responsiveness by covering a site’s entire spectrum of interactions, from the time a page first begins to load until the user leaves the page. This comprehensive measurement makes INP a more reliable indicator of a site’s overall responsiveness than FID.
This is particularly difficult on mobile. We took a look at a handful of sites across the industry and within our site network, and found that on mobile, INP scores are 35.5% worse than FID on average. When reviewing desktop performance across the same dataset, there was only a 14.1% drop on average.
How to Improve Your INP Score
RebelMouse has prioritized page performance not just as a selling point of our platform, but as a company pillar. It’s why we outperform competitors on Google’s Core Web Vitals metrics. To do this correctly, it takes a lot of optimization to perfect every moment of your site’s load time. We’ve done this through a simplified version of code that still allows for ads, videos, and third-party applications to load quickly.
Our track record of high performance means that we’re ready for Google’s switch to INP over FID.
Here are a couple of reasons why:
Built-In INP Monitoring
RebelMouse is known for powering the fastest sites on the web. Our reputation for performance is thanks to our obsession with Google’s Core Web Vitals metrics. Unlike other platforms, we don't just optimize for page speed, we continually monitor critical metrics like Interaction to Next Paint to ensure the sites within our network remain compliant.
One way we do this is through our built-in Core Web Vitals monitoring. Directly integrated into RebelMouse’s CMS, your site is continually monitored for Core Web Vitals performance, including Google’s INP metric. This around-the-clock observation will identify any INP failures immediately and offer solutions to fix errors quickly.
Get Ahead of the Rest of the Web
An audit from Ahrefs found that only 33% of sites are meeting the Core Web Vitals threshold.
If you’re unsure about how your site is performing against Google’s standards, request a free website health check from us today. You can also request a proposal to see if making the switch to a high-performance platform is right for you.
Grab Some Extra Performance Knowledge: One Year After Core Web Vitals
RebelMouse Founder Andrea Breanna and DeepCrawl's Jamie Indigo recently spoke about the evolution of Core Web Vitals and how SEOs should approach this user-centered ranking factor, one year after Google's page experience update.